Our weekly crypto derivatives analytics report delves into macro events and the current state of crypto and trading signals from spot trading volume, as well as futures, options and perpetual contracts.

Another week brought another risk-off event in the crypto market, reflecting its correlation with equities. Despite last week's sell-off, BTC outperformed the broader market with a milder decline, evident in its derivatives positioning. Options markets initially priced short-term volatility higher, but the inversion resolved quickly. In contrast, ETH experienced a sharper inversion, with significant spikes in short-term options and realized volatility. A liquidation event led to an estimated $10 billion loss in open interest for perpetual swap contracts, 

. This bearish sentiment was reflected in funding rates, with altcoins showing a more persistent negative trend post-crash as compared to BTC.

Open interest collapsed across major tokens, flipping funding rates negative, except for BTC. ETH's realized volatility surged above 140%, its highest level in over three months, with the implied volatility term structure spiking and remaining inverted days after the crash.

Please check out the report’s highlights.

Open Interest Falls During Painful Liquidation Event

Another Monday sell-off occurred alongside a decline in U.S. equities and other risk-on assets due to fears over Trump tariffs, leading to a drop in perpetual swap positioning. Nearly $3.1 billion in open interest was wiped out from the perpetual swap markets of BTC, ETH, XRP and SOL after a late-Friday high. This decline was likely driven by liquidated leveraged positions, as traders missed margin calls during the rapid drop in spot prices. Bybit CEO Ben Zhou estimated that the true notional value of liquidated positions across markets may have ranged from $8 billion to $10 billion. The sell-off also triggered the largest spike in trading volumes in over a month, with $31 billion in perpetual swap contracts traded on Feb 2, 2025 across the four major tokens’ markets.

Altcoin Funding Rates in Negative; BTC Clings to Neutral Rates

A second consecutive Monday-morning sell-off has kept perpetual swap funding rates low and negative, indicating excess demand for leveraged short exposure. This trend likely stems from the liquidation of long positions, due to the sharp correction in spot prices. Notably, altcoins' funding rates have shown more consistency since February 3, 2024, reflecting their steeper declines as compared to BTC’s.

ETH's spot price experienced a deeper correction than BTC’s during Monday's sell-off, dropping below $2.5K. Surprisingly, options market activity remained steady, likely due to fewer at-risk leveraged long positions to liquidate, thus keeping open interest levels firm. However, the spot move caused realized volatility to spike near 140%, with options markets pricing in a significant term structure inversion that has yet to be resolved. ETH's implied volatility is approximately 15 points higher than BTC's at equivalent tenors, indicating that traders expect continued volatility in ETH's spot price.

Advanced

block-scholes-x-bybit-report.jpeg

Bybit X Block Scholes Crypto Derivatives Analytics Report (Feb 5, 2025): Record Liquidations Result From Perp; Traders Expect More Volatility in ETH

Victoria VR leverages AI and blockchain to enhance gaming with immersive VR experiences, AI-driven interactions, and a self-sustaining digital economy.

With over 3 billion gamers worldwide (and counting), the 

 industry needs to constantly find new and innovative ways to keep their myriad participants entertained and engaged. Technologies such as virtual reality (VR) and the 

, which include augmented reality (AR) and 

, have contributed substantially to creating an immersive gaming experience.

As the metaverse continues to unlock endless opportunities for the gaming world, Victoria VR has set out on a mission to integrate artificial intelligence (AI) to improve gaming experiences.

Let’s take a deeper look at Victoria VR and the way it’s leveraging AI to tap into the gaming metaverse and upgrade users' experiences.

Victoria VR is a blockchain-powered virtual reality (VR) AI metaverse designed to leverage AI and VR to provide an immersive web3 gaming experience. 

The Victoria VR blockchain project is on a mission to create a thriving and immersive infrastructure in which the gaming world can explore its metaverse in an enhanced way.

Through AI, Victoria VR provides gaming developers with AI tools to build immersive games in a secure, transparent and scalable ecosystem. With features like the VR AI Builder and AI Agents, Victoria VR provides an AI-powered ecosystem to interact with its metaverse.

Its native token, VR, is poised to provide users with a self-sustaining virtual economy in which gaming, blockchain, the metaverse and VR content creation can interact cohesively.

To shape the future of VR through an AI-powered metaverse for immersive gaming, Victoria VR has created the following features.

The VR AI Builder is designed to simplify developers' challenges when creating VR content. Currently, VR game development requires programming skills and significant resources in terms of time and money. However, the VR AI Builder is integrated with OpenAI, making it simple to use with simple text commands. With VR AI Builder, anyone can quickly create VR content, thereby reducing costs, saving time and supporting scalable growth. It also supports integrating new AI technologies as they continually emerge.

The VR AI Builder empowers both novices and experienced developers to create and expand virtual worlds, complete with games and assets. Furthermore companies can use the VR AI Builder to create virtual buildings, showrooms and storefronts; simulate training; and provide immersive experiences to their customers.

The VR AI Builder is driven by the VR token, which plays a crucial role in building and monetizing virtual worlds.

At the heart of Victoria VR’s metaverse are its AI Agents, autonomous and intelligent creations that can independently interact and adapt in a virtual environment. These agents learn user behaviors and preferences in order to provide customized and effective support.

Creating VR AI Agents on the platform is accessible to everyone, and doesn’t require advanced technical knowledge. Some specific roles these agents can perform include NPCs in games, shopping assistants in virtual stores and even virtual teachers.

VRtap is a Telegram-based clicker PvP game by Victoria VR that uses feng shui to immerse players in an elemental adventure, helping the project community stay connected and engaged.

Some of the features of VRtap include the following:

VR is the native token that powers the Victoria VR platform. It's designed to facilitate seamless interaction on the platform and ensure a self-sustaining economy. The total supply of VR is 16.8 billion tokens, with a current circulating supply of just under 6.85 billion.

As a utility token, VR has numerous use cases on the platform, including staking, governance and diverse use in powering Victoria VR's AI and gaming aspects.

The VR token is crucial to the self-sustaining aspect of Victoria VR's gaming pillar. It’s designed to ensure long-term sustainable value for the various stakeholders in the ecosystem.

The VR token is essential for accessing and monetizing the VR AI Builder feature. Builders need VR tokens to buy VR land in order to start using the feature. Once you have VR content, you can monetize it and receive payments in VR tokens.

Furthermore, the platform collects part of the fees generated through this feature in the form of VR tokens, which boosts circulation and enhances token utility.

The VR token helps create and fuel intelligent virtual experiences through VR AI Agents on Victoria VR. VR tokens’ use cases for VR AI Agents include the following:

VR tokens facilitate user interaction with the Victoria VR metaverse via both PC and mobile versions. Users can earn VR tokens through activities such as mining and community engagement. These tokens also ensure a cross-platform economy, whereby VR tokens earned from either version can be used across the Victoria VR ecosystem.

 Perpetual contract in the Innovation Zone with up to 20x leverage. Tokens listed in the Innovation Zone are typically from new projects that may be subject to higher volatility.

As of Feb 7, 2025, Victoria VR's price was $0.007863, a 98.7% drop from its all-time high (ATH) price of $0.61 on Dec 10, 2021, and a 67.7% increase from its ATL of $0.0047 on Jan 3, 2023.

Price prediction experts are cautiously bullish on the future price of the VR token. Experts at CoinCodex believe that VR 

 a maximum price of $0.01 in 2027, and increase to $0.03 in 2030. Meanwhile, DigitalCoinPrice’s forecasting experts believe that VR 

 $0.028 in 2027 and reach $0.0425 by 2030.

That said, these bullish predictions don't guarantee the future price of VR. We highly recommend you 

 before investing in VR or any other cryptocurrency.

Victoria VR is redefining the metaverse with its AI-driven, hyperrealistic virtual world. By blending blockchain technology with immersive VR, it offers an unparalleled digital experience so users can explore, interact and create with limitless possibilities.

Victoria VR’s integration of AI into gaming through the VR AI Builder and AI Agents gives it a competitive edge, and makes the project stand out in the web3 space, making its native token, VR, an asset to watch in the web3 space.

Beginner

Victoria VR.png

Victoria VR (VR): The Ultimate AI-Driven Metaverse Experience

Explore the difference between Spot and Perpetual Futures and find out how you can navigate volatile markets with these two trading methods.

Bitcoin moves 20% in an hour. Ethereum nose-dives as a whale dumps holdings. The crypto market is a poster child of volatility, and panicked traders may scramble. Others, calmer, may seize the chaos in order to profit. What separates these two outcomes? Often, it’s the trader’s hard choice of weapon.

Although spot trading and perpetual futures are both popular trading methods in crypto, their mechanics — and risks — are worlds apart. Spot trading offers simplicity and direct ownership, while perpetual futures provide leverage and flexibility. Each method carries its unique risks. 

In volatile markets, these tools behave differently, and a poor understanding of their dynamics can turn a calculated risk into a catastrophe. This article dissects spot and perpetual futures, explains why volatility amplifies their risks — and shows you how to choose the right strategy when markets go haywire. 

 is the buying or selling of a digital asset (like 

) for immediate delivery and settlement at its current market price. When you trade on spot, you directly exchange cash or 

 for the asset, with no expiration dates, 

You directly and physically own the asset as soon as the transaction is completed. The trade is settled on the spot (hence the name), meaning the exchange of the asset and the payment happen almost instantaneously, eliminating the risk of price fluctuations during the settlement period.

Say Bitcoin is priced at $100,000, and you buy 1 BTC on a spot exchange such as Bybit. You pay $100,000 (or equivalent in stablecoins) and immediately receive the Bitcoin in your wallet. If the price crashes to $90,000 the next day, your BTC is now worth $90,000 — a 10% loss. If, on the other hand, it surges to $106,000, your gain is 6%. The risk and reward are straightforward: you’re fully exposed to the asset’s price movement, with no amplified gains or losses. 

Here’s a visualization of the mechanics:

[Crypto Exchange] → [Deposit Fiat Currency/Stablecoins] → [Purchase Cryptocurrency on Spot Market] → [Wallet] 

 (or "perps") are derivative contracts or agreements to buy or sell an asset at a predetermined price at any time in the future. They let traders speculate on an asset’s price without ever taking ownership of it. 

Unlike traditional futures, which expire on a set date, perpetuals have no expiration — hence the name. Instead, they rely on funding rates to tether their prices to the underlying spot market. If combined with leverage, they’re a high-risk, high-reward tool for potentially profiting in volatile markets. 

Perpetual futures allow traders to use leverage, meaning the exposure is larger than the initial capital. For example, with 10x leverage, a $1,000 margin lets you open a $10,000 position. If Bitcoin rises 10%, your profit is $1,000 (10% of $10,000), doubling your initial margin. But if Bitcoin drops 10%, you lose your entire margin ($1,000) and face 

. Leverage magnifies volatility’s impact, turning small price swings into existential risks.

 is the collateral required to open a leveraged position (e.g., $1,000 for a $10,000 position at 10x), while the 

 is the minimum collateral needed to keep the position open. If your margin falls below this threshold, due to losses, you must add more funds or the exchange liquidates your position automatically. 

Let’s assume you open a 10x long on Ethereum with a $1,000 margin. If ETH drops 9%, your loss is $900, leaving $100 in margin. If the maintenance margin is 5% ($50), you’re still safe. But a 10% drop in Ethereum wipes out your margin, triggering liquidation. 

Funding rates are periodic payments (usually every eight hours) between 

 traders to keep perpetual futures prices close to the spot price. A positive funding rate exists when longs pay shorts. This happens when perpetuals trade above the spot price, incentivizing traders to sell (short). Negative funding rates — meaning that shorts pay long — occur when perpetuals trade below the spot price, encouraging buying (going long). 

In volatile markets, funding rates can swing wildly. For example, during a Bitcoin rally, excessive bullish sentiment may push perpetuals’ prices above spot prices, forcing longs to pay hefty fees to shorts. 

Trading a perp looks something like this:

[Trader’s Margin] → [Leverage (e.g., 10x)] → [Open Position] 

[Price Movement] → [Profit/Loss Calculated in Real Time] 

[Funding Rate Payments] (Every 8 Hours) 

[Liquidation if Margin < Maintenance Threshold] 

The Crucial Difference: Pricing Mechanisms

Traders must understand how prices are set in spot trading versus perpetual futures, especially in volatile markets, as mispricing can lead to unexpected losses or missed opportunities. 

 on a single exchange. When you buy Bitcoin on Bybit, the price reflects the highest 

 (sell order) in Bybit’s order book at that moment. When more people want to buy an asset than sell it, the price increases. Conversely, when more people want to sell than buy, the asset’s price drops.

However, spot prices can vary wildly between exchanges. High-volume exchanges, such as Binance or Bybit, typically have tighter 

 (smaller gaps between bid/ask prices). Regulatory restrictions and/or regional buying/selling pressure can also create price disparities. 

Perpetual futures prices aren’t tied to a single exchange. Instead, they track an index price, a weighted average of spot prices from multiple reputable exchanges. This arrangement prevents manipulation, and ensures fairness.

First, reputable exchanges with strong liquidity, such as Binance, Bybit and Kraken, are selected as contributors. Weights are then assigned based on trading volume, giving greater influence to exchanges with higher activity. The index price is computed using a weighted average, whereby (for instance) Binance contributes 50%, Bybit 30% and Kraken 20%, resulting in a balanced and representative market price.

Here’s a visual aid for the calculation: 

Index Price = (Binance Price × 50%) + (Bybit Price × 30%) + (Kraken Price × 20%).

Perpetual Futures Price ≈ Index Price + Funding Rate Adjustments 

Withdrawal halts occur when exchanges temporarily block users from moving assets off-platform. They are rare but catastrophic events, often triggered by extreme volatility, regulatory crackdowns or security breaches. These halts expose the fragility of spot markets, while highlighting the resilience of perpetual futures.

Imagine an exchange suddenly halts withdrawals. Its spot market turns into an isolated bubble, cut off from the broader crypto ecosystem. Here’s how this could happen:

 traders help balance prices across exchanges. If BTC is cheaper on one platform, some traders will buy it there and sell it on another where Bitcoin’s price is higher, keeping prices in sync. But when withdrawals are frozen, traders can’t move assets, making cross-exchange arbitrage impossible.

Let’s say Binance halts BTC withdrawals during a market crash. Panic selling on Binance drives BTC’s price down to $25,000, while on Bybit, it remains at $28,000. Under normal conditions, arbitrageurs would step in, buying cheap BTC on Binance and selling it on Bybit to close the gap. But with withdrawals locked, Binance’s price remains disconnected.

With liquidity trapped, bad actors can exploit the situation. A 

 could dump BTC on Binance, crashing its price to $22,000, while Bybit keeps trading at $28,000. Retail traders on Binance would suffer large losses as they’d be unable to transfer assets or take advantage of the price difference.

When withdrawals freeze, spot markets fracture, leaving traders stranded in a distorted price bubble, with no hope of escape until normal operations resume.

Perpetual futures contracts avoid the chaos of isolated spot markets by relying on an index price aggregated from multiple exchanges. This mechanism keeps them anchored to the broader market, even when individual platforms experience disruptions. 

For example, if Binance suddenly halts withdrawals, its BTC price may diverge from the rest of the market. However, because the index also includes prices from exchanges like Bybit and Kraken, it remains stable. Even with Binance carrying a 50% weight in the index, Bybit (30%) and Kraken (20%) ensure that the final calculation reflects a more accurate market value. This mechanism prevents traders from becoming trapped in a price bubble caused by a single exchange’s issues.

Another advantage is resistance to manipulation. If a bad actor tries to crash BTC’s price on one exchange, their influence on the index remains limited. To meaningfully distort the index price, they would need to control multiple major exchanges — a far more challenging and costly feat. 

This hardiness makes perpetual futures a more reliable option during crisis scenarios. Spot traders may get stuck with distorted prices when withdrawals are halted, but perps remain tethered to a broader market view. While they’re not immune to volatility, their reliance on aggregated data provides a crucial safeguard. However, traders must also consider funding rates and leverage risks.

Navigating a Withdrawal Halt: Staying Calm and Informed 

A crypto withdrawal halt — whether due to a flash crash, regulatory action or technical failure — can send traders into a frenzy. Prices may swing unpredictably as speculation runs wild and liquidity dries up. Nevertheless, survival in these moments is about keeping a level head.

Before making any moves, verify the situation. Fear-driven rumors spread fast, but official channels provide the facts. Exchanges like Bybit now offer real-time transparency on liquidations via their APIs, and CEO Ben Zhou has been vocal about publishing 

 during crises. Trust credible sources, not whispers from anonymous Telegram groups.

Emotional trading is the fastest way to lock in losses. Spot market prices on a halted exchange can detach from reality, plunging far below the broader market. Selling into that panic only benefits manipulators. Likewise, overleveraging on perpetual futures can backfire during times of extreme volatility. Traders who endure these moments best are the ones who stick to their risk management principles and wait for conditions to stabilize.

Bybit is setting new standards by committing to transparency, publicizing real-time liquidation data and encouraging open communication. During times of uncertainty, reliable data keeps traders grounded, helping them separate signals from noise and navigate volatility with clarity rather than fear.

Volatile markets test the strengths and weaknesses of both spot and perpetual futures trading. 

Cryptocurrency markets thrive on volatility, but surviving and profiting from volatility depends upon choosing the right tools. Spot trading offers direct asset ownership, simplicity and no liquidation risk, but it can be vulnerable to exchange-specific halts and price slippage during market turmoil. On the other hand, perpetual futures trading allows traders to profit in any market direction, benefit from leverage and avoid single-exchange manipulation through index-based pricing, but it also carries liquidation risks, complexity and funding rate costs. 

Regardless of your trading method of choice, risk management is crucial. Educate yourself and set 

 to minimize exposure. In addition, dive into Bybit’s 

 to sharpen your edge, and learn how to get started with 

Intermediate

spot vs perpetual futures.png

Spot vs. Perpetual Futures: Stay Ahead of the Curve in Volatile Markets

Ankr has been chosen to power TAC, a groundbreaking TON Network extension that brings full EVM compatibility to TON. 

The S&P 500 rose 0.36%, led by consumer staples, financials, and tech, as investors awaited the jobs report. Gold fell 0.38% to $2,852 amid rising yields and profit-taking before the jobs report but remains near YTD highs. Coindesk Indices, an index measuring broader cryptocurrency market performance was down by 0.81%, with Bitcoin and Ether dropping by 0.44% and 2.91%, in the past 24 hours. Trade these markets and more with up to 500x leverage on Bybit MT5 using this 

Today’s top performer is BERA, which surged nearly 3.0% following Berachain's mainnet launch and $632M BERA airdrop announcement.

Berachain (BERA), founded in 2021, is a Layer 1 blockchain with Proof-of-Liquidity consensus, ensuring security and liquidity while maintaining full Ethereum compatibility. Berachain launched its 

 on February 6, alongside a $632 million BERA airdrop to eligible users. Around 79 million BERA tokens were distributed, primarily to Bong Bears NFT holders. BERA serves as the network’s gas and staking token. Berachain uses a Proof-of-Liquidity consensus to enhance security and liquidity. Token allocations also include funds for community initiatives, ecosystem R&D, and institutional investors.

Check Out the Latest Prices, Charts, and Data of 

, a groundbreaking TON Network extension that brings full EVM compatibility to TON. TAC enables Ethereum developers to deploy seamlessly on TON while unlocking access to 100M active wallets and Telegram's 950M users. Built using the Cosmos SDK and Ethermint, TAC integrates Babylon’s Bitcoin staking protocol for enhanced security and decentralization. Assets like Teleport BTC (tgBTC), stTON, and tsTON will support restaking within TAC’s infrastructure. As the first blockchain leveraging Ankr’s Bitcoin Secured Infrastructure, TAC bridges Ethereum’s liquidity with TON’s scalability, advancing Web3 growth within Telegram’s ecosystem.

Yesterday, BTC Spot ETFs had $140.2M in outflows, with GBTC losing $42.2M and non-GBTC funds dropping $98.0M.

Kuroro Wilds, an Ethereum RPG on Ronin, launched a 

 campaign ahead of its KURO token launch. Players earn rewards by completing quests, social tasks, and referrals. The event offers 10M KURO and Treasure Eggs, running until mid-February. VIP pass holders get extra rewards, while top players can win additional prizes. KURO’s launch date is yet to be announced.

3.png

Ankr Powers TAC to Bridge TON and Ethereum with Bitcoin-Secured Infrastructure for Enhanced Web3 Growth

Bybit Learn

Stablecoin

Looking to find out more about USDT vs. USDC? Explore our detailed guide to find out the differences and similarities between USDT and USDC.

2401-T16454_Skinny_Banner_for_Blog_and_Learn_Row_53_728x90.png

Skinny_Banner-1600x400.webp

Cryptocurrencies have a reputation for being highly volatile, but not all blockchain tokens vary in value. There's a whole class of cryptos, called stablecoins, that prioritize keeping their price as regular as possible. Many of these 

, such as USDT and USDC, maintain their price by pegging their value to the United States dollar. However, even if their prices seem similar at a glance, USD-pegged stablecoins aren't identical. If you're interested in learning more about stablecoins, explore this guide to find out the differences between USDT and USDC.

 is the largest stablecoin in the cryptocurrency market. Also called Tether, it's been operated by the Tether Limited company since 2014. Tether is pegged to the U.S. dollar, and is backed by a blend of gold and fiat currency.

 is a stablecoin that was introduced in 2018. Previously called USD Coin, this crypto is issued by the Centre Consortium, a joint venture between Coinbase and Circle. USDC is backed by the U.S. dollar and U.S. Treasury securities. Its value is pegged to that of the U.S. dollar.

USDT vs. USDC: Differences and Similarities

A single USDT or USDC token might have roughly equivalent values, but this doesn't mean they're interchangeable. There are many different factors to consider if you're looking for the differences between USDC and USDT.

Both USDT and USDC are fiat-backed stablecoins pegged to the U.S. dollar. This means that they're set up to always have the same value as the American dollar. To help with this goal, their parent companies hold a reserve of dollars to guarantee the value of their coins. 

However, USDC has some additional backing that USDT doesn’t have. In addition to its reserve of dollars, it also holds some 

. These cash-equivalent assets provide an extra level of security for USDC.

USDT is significantly older than USDC. It was launched in 2014, whereas USDC didn’t exist until four years later. USDT also happens to be the first fiat-backed stablecoin in existence. By the time USDC arrived, USDT was already an industry leader with years of brand recognition. 

USDT and USDC are both leaders in the stablecoin markets. For many years, they've routinely outranked their competitors. However, USDT still leads USDC by 

, with an approximate market capitalization of $110 billion as compared to USDC's $33 billion. 

Keep in mind that while USDT is traded more by investors, USDC might be used more for 

 transactions. Data from Visa suggests that in 2024, USDC began to outpace USDT as the preferred choice for stablecoin crypto payments.

Both USDT and USDC offer the option to redeem stablecoins. As part of their mission to demonstrate that stablecoins are just as reliable as fiat currency, their users can trade their stablecoins for U.S. dollars. However, USDT’s redemption capabilities are somewhat more limited. Users can only redeem funds when they hold at least 100,000 USDT, while USDC users can redeem funds as soon as they hold 100 USDC. In addition, users report that USDC's redemption process is simpler and faster.

When it comes to transparency, USDT and USDC have drastically different outlooks. Over the years, USDT has faced many claims about misleading investors. There have been rumors of price manipulation, as well as assertions that Tether doesn’t actually hold the amount of reserves it claims to possess. These concerns regarding transparency have been partially proven in investigations. At one point, Tether was fined by regulatory bodies for holding the reserves that it claimed to have in place 

. Additionally, concerns were raised as to the specifics and integrity of its holdings.

Meanwhile, USDC has been fairly committed to transparency. It uses an independent company that audits its reserves and releases reports to the public on a monthly basis. Compared to Tether's quarterly audits, USDC's audits are more frequent, and provide a more detailed breakdown of its asset reserves.

When it comes to reputation, each of these stablecoins has its pros and cons. USDT is usually seen as an icon within the stablecoin industry, being one of the first and also most recognizable. When users are discussing stablecoins, Tether invariably comes up. Unfortunately, USDT has also had some prominent public relations failures that make investors more wary of its brand.

USDC doesn't have quite as many fans as USDT, and it's viewed as less of a trailblazer. However, its many fans point out that it's much more reliable than Tether. USDC was created partially in reaction to Tether's transparency issues, so investors often speak of it as the safer, more secure option.

As stablecoins, USDC and USDT are both generally valued around $1. However, stablecoins don't generally maintain a value of precisely $1 all of the time. Not only are there occasional fluctuations, such as a coin's price dropping to (for example) $0.9996, but situations can also arise in which prices become drastically altered. These incidents, called depegs, can greatly destabilize the market.

Both USDC and USDT have experienced infamous depegging incidents. While USDT has dropped as low as $0.99, USDC has gone all the way down to $0.87. Although both coins have managed to easily recover in value, any fluctuation can cause problems for investors. Analysis suggests that USDC has had 

Both USDT and USDC claim to follow international financial compliance measures. This means they follow industry best practices for protecting both their funds and their consumers. However, USDT's claims are a little more difficult to verify as compared to those of USDC, whose audits show that its reserves are held within regulated financial organizations so that it can prove it follows laws and recommendations for protecting its investors.

USDC and USDT are both known for their flexibility. They run on multiple blockchains and are used as currency at a variety of traditional and web3 businesses. Though USDT has greater liquidity and supply than USDC, both coins have liquidity large enough to easily support vast amounts of trading. 

There are some differences in where these coins are available. USDT operates on 12 chains, including 

. Meanwhile, USDC is natively supported on 16 chains, including Ethereum, 

 and others. Regardless, even if USDC is on more chains, USDT is accepted by almost twice as many businesses.

As you can see, USDT and USDC both have their own pros and cons. When it comes to USDC vs. USDT, the right choice for you will simply depend upon your priorities and how you plan to use the coin. 

USDT or USDC — Which Is a Better Investment?

Stablecoins don't shift a lot in price, so neither USDT nor USDC will avail you of the potentially wild profit increases of some other types of cryptocurrencies. However, they still have a lot of uses in the 

 investment world. Both USDT and USDC are popular choices for investors who choose to participate in 

When it comes to investing, USDT has a slight edge over USDC. Either one can work well, but USDT simply has a much larger market share. Its larger supply and trading volume and higher market cap all lead to more opportunities for investors. Furthermore, USDT's popularity means it's used in more web3 projects. This all contributes to making USDT more available when you want to use DeFi investing to earn passive income on your tokens. 

Meanwhile, although USDC's slightly more frequent rates of depegging might make it seem scary for an investor, depegging also comes with some opportunities for profit. Not only can you try to use options to 

 the coin, but you can participate in various token 

 in stablecoin prices. However, even if USDC is useful for these sorts of techniques, keep in mind that arbitrage bots, options and other similar investment strategies can be especially risky. Often, only advanced traders who invest at optimal moments end up profiting. 

Which Should You Pay With — USDT or USDC?

If you plan on using either of these stablecoins to buy more crypto or make other purchases, USDC is often the better choice. The coin has a better track record for transparency and regulatory compliance. Furthermore, it's easier to convert your USDC back into U.S. dollars, which makes it a flexible payment choice. 

The other primary consideration is USDT's widespread adoption. Even if USDC makes more sense as a payment method, some businesses only accept USDT. Therefore, if you can only choose one stablecoin and want to be able to spend it in many locations, USDT might be the better pick for you.

If you prefer long-term planning, it's essential to consider the futures of both USDC and USDT. Right now, USDT's popularity makes it the go-to option for many activities. However, more and more crypto enthusiasts are becoming wary of Tether. USDC’s reputation as the safer option might serve it well in the future. 

Industry data paints an intriguing picture of which coin is on the rise. Not only has USDC been 

 in the past year, but the summer of 2024 has led to big changes for this token. When Circle became the first stablecoin to receive approval from European regulators, traders took note, and tremendous growth in trading volume took place for USDC. By the end of July, volume was 

This has led to a lot of speculation about Tether finally being outpaced by USDC. Crypto trends suggest that regulation will become even more common in the future — and USDC is already doing a great job of satisfying regulations. Unless USDT is able to greatly improve its security and transparency, it may struggle to keep up.

Ultimately, both USDT and USDC have many reasons to hold their positions at the top of the stablecoin market. While USDT is an industry icon that holds large market shares, USDC has managed to become one of the most reliable and transparent choices. Currently, there's no definitive decision on which one is better, but rising interest in USDC suggests it might be the stablecoin of the future.

USDT vs. USDC: The Battle for Stablecoin Supremacy

Grab Up to 5,000 USDT in Rewards

Grab Up to 5,000 USDT in Rewards